The Slow Failure: Why High-Protein Drinks Are Gelling on the Shelf

Protein fortification has become a defining feature of contemporary beverage development, extending from coffee and bottled water to plant-based milks and nutrition drinks. As declared protein levels increase from 20 g per serving to 30 g or more, manufacturers face a consequential stability challenge that may remain undetected until well after release from the production line.

A high-protein beverage may meet all in-plant quality criteria, ship with acceptable appearance and viscosity, and then gradually form a gel after several weeks of storage. This phenomenon, known as age gelation, differs from rapid phase separation observed during early bench testing. Its delayed onset means that visible failure often occurs only after the product has entered distribution, storage, retail, or consumer use, where the commercial consequences include returns, waste, and loss of confidence.

Age gelation is therefore a formulation problem, a shelf-life risk, and, where clean-label claims are central to positioning, a potential failure of product promise. It is not attributable to a single mechanism; rather, multiple physicochemical and biochemical processes proceed in parallel and can converge on the same macroscopic outcome.

WHAT AGE GELATION IS

Age gelation develops during storage. Over weeks or months, a beverage may appear stable while viscosity increases progressively until the system reaches a critical threshold and forms a weak gel. Unlike sedimentation, which may be partially reversible by shaking, gelation is generally not reversible in the finished package.1 The timing of this transition is system dependent, and thermal history, including the severity of sterilization, is a major determinant.2

The practical question is thus not whether protein systems can gel under storage, but whether gelation occurs within the intended shelf life and which interventions can extend the time to failure.

THE FIVE CLOCKS

Several mechanisms can contribute to age gelation, and in commercial systems more than one is typically active. A useful framework is to consider five concurrent “clocks,” each progressing toward network formation. Reducing the rate of one mechanism may improve stability, but the remaining pathways can continue to advance.

1. Enzymes that survive the heat.

Certain proteolytic enzymes retain activity after thermal processing and continue to cleave proteins during storage. This pathway is particularly relevant in dairy systems. Plasmin is endogenous to milk,3 whereas AprX is a heat-stable protease produced by psychrotrophic bacteria that may proliferate in raw milk prior to processing and remain active after the organisms themselves are eliminated.4 Casein micelles are stabilized by surface structures that limit aggregation; proteolytic degradation can reduce this stabilization, promote micelle association, and initiate network formation, with biochemical or structural indicators detectable before visible gelation occurs.5

This mechanism is substantially less relevant to plant proteins: pea, soy, and fava proteins do not contain plasmin and are not normally associated with the same milk-derived bacterial protease pathway.

2. Proteins that clump on their own.

Even in the absence of enzymatic activity, heat treatment can destabilize proteins. In milk, heat-induced interactions between whey proteins and casein micelles can evolve during storage as associated proteins reorganize and participate in aggregate growth, increasing viscosity and ultimately contributing to gel formation.1 Plant proteins often present a greater solubility challenge because many are seed storage proteins that are compact, relatively insoluble, and prone to unfolding and aggregation under heat.6 Consequently, plant-based high-protein beverages may begin closer to the aggregation threshold, making solubility management central to formulation strategy.7 Studies in pea and fava protein systems illustrate this behavior.8

3. Calcium that glues proteins together.

Calcium can serve as an ionic bridge between protein structures. In dairy systems, casein micelles contain mineral calcium phosphate, and shifts in soluble mineral equilibria during storage can increase protein–protein association.9 The concentration of soluble calcium and accompanying changes in pH strongly influence the rate and extent of destabilization.10 Plant proteins do not contain an equivalent micellar mineral reservoir, but they are highly sensitive to added or background divalent minerals in process water or fortification systems; calcium addition can therefore provide the bridges required for gel network formation.6

4. Slow browning.

Nonenzymatic chemistry also contributes to storage instability. Maillard reactions between reducing sugars and protein amino groups proceed slowly at ambient conditions, generating products that can promote cross-linking, changes in colloidal behavior, sedimentation, and gelation.11 Reaction extent depends strongly on the carbohydrate involved.12 In plant-protein systems, glycation has a dual role: uncontrolled reactions may contribute to instability, whereas controlled pre-treatment can improve pea protein solubility and thermal stability for acidic beverage applications.7

5. Sulfur bonds that chain up.

Thermal processing can expose reactive sulfhydryl groups that subsequently form disulfide bonds, creating covalent links between proteins. In whey-based beverages, such reactions can continue during storage, with aggregation increasing as a function of time and temperature.1314 Similar processes occur in plant proteins, where disulfide-mediated structure is already prominent in soy and pea proteins and heat can further promote intermolecular bonding.156 One promising mitigation strategy is controlled upstream heat treatment, which can modify protein behavior before final processing and improve the stability of the finished beverage.16

Together, these mechanisms—proteolysis, protein aggregation, divalent-mineral bridging, Maillard chemistry, and disulfide bonding—do not act sequentially. In a real beverage matrix, they overlap, making root-cause attribution difficult without targeted diagnostic work.

WHY MORE PROTEIN MAKES IT WORSE

Increasing protein concentration accelerates instability through several coupled effects: there is more substrate for proteolysis, greater opportunity for intermolecular contact, and, in many systems, more mineral interaction. Studies of high-protein dairy beverages demonstrate these concentration effects, and elevated storage temperature further accelerates destabilization.17 18 Even well-formulated aseptic products continue to evolve during storage; the mechanisms do not stop, but proceed at rates determined by composition, processing, and storage conditions.19 Protein concentration is therefore a central variable, but not the only one; upstream protein processing can determine how close a system is to aggregation before it enters the final package.

WHICH CLOCK LEADS DEPENDS ON THE PROTEIN

The dominant mechanism depends on protein source and process history. In dairy systems, residual proteolytic activity may be the principal driver and is often difficult to address through formulation alone. In plant-protein systems such as pea, soy, and fava, aggregation and disulfide-mediated network formation are often more prominent, particularly because the proteins may already have limited solubility. Mixed dairy–plant systems add further complexity, as co-aggregation can generate structures that neither protein source forms independently.20 Effective mitigation therefore begins with identifying which mechanism is rate limiting in the specific beverage matrix.

THE TOOLBOX, AND WHAT EACH TOOL CANNOT DO

A range of formulation and process interventions can delay age gelation, but each addresses only part of the failure pathway. Misidentifying the dominant mechanism can therefore produce an apparently rational intervention that does not materially extend shelf life.

—  Hydrocolloids such as pectin, cellulose gum, guar, and gellan can increase viscosity, improve suspension, and slow the transition toward a gel; appropriate selection can be particularly useful in acidic protein beverages, although sensory tradeoffs must be considered.2122 However, viscosity modification primarily changes the kinetics of visible failure and does not eliminate upstream enzymatic or covalent drivers.

—  Calcium sequestrants, including sodium hexametaphosphate, can reduce soluble calcium activity and thereby limit mineral-mediated bridging.17 This approach can be effective when calcium is a major driver, but it does not address proteolysis, disulfide bonding, or Maillard chemistry, and it may introduce additional labeling and sodium considerations.

—  Improving raw milk quality targets proteolytic instability at its source by limiting bacterial growth and the production of heat-stable enzymes before sterilization. One approach uses lactose oxidase to suppress Pseudomonas activity and delay age gelation in UHT milk.23

—  Protein pre-treatment can address heat-induced aggregation and disulfide-mediated instability by modifying protein structure under controlled conditions before final beverage processing.16

For plant-based beverages, the primary formulation emphasis is typically protein solubility and colloidal stabilization rather than control of milk-derived proteases. Relevant tools include pH adjustment, controlled glycation, fiber or hydrocolloid systems, mineral management, and gentler processing conditions. No single intervention addresses all five mechanisms.

WHERE SEATEX FITS

Within this framework, SeaTex is positioned as a seaweed-based stabilizer intended to address two common instability pathways: protein aggregation and calcium-mediated bridging. Used at low inclusion levels of approximately 0.02–0.3%, it can support suspension and stability without requiring a separate calcium binder. These mechanisms are relevant in both dairy and plant-protein beverages, which is why the ingredient may be applicable across dairy blends, pea-protein systems, plant-based milks, and high-protein chocolate or coffee beverages. In internal application work, SeaTex has shown differentiated suspension performance relative to benchmarks. Its limitation is equally important: it is not designed to inactivate residual proteases in enzyme-driven dairy gelation, which must be addressed through milk quality, processing, and ingredient selection.

WHERE TO START

When a high-protein beverage thickens during storage, the first step is diagnosis. Protein source, heat treatment, mineral profile, storage temperature, and the timing of viscosity increase all provide evidence about the dominant mechanism.  Theidentity the most probable failure pathway and determine whether the appropriate intervention belongs in the formulation, the upstream process, or the selection of protein and mineral ingredients.

Marine Biologics makes SeaTex, a seaweed-based clean-label stabilizer for high-protein food and beverage. We are a small team of food scientists who spend our days on what happens to protein over a long shelf life. If you would rather talk to a person, reach out at contact@marinebiologics.com.

SOURCES

1. Raynes, J.K., Vincent, D., Zawadzki, J.L., Savin, K.W., Mertens, D., Logan, A., Williams, R. (2018). Investigation of Age Gelation in UHT Milk. Beverages 4(4):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4040095

2. Age Gelation in Direct Steam Infusion Ultra-High-Temperature Milk: Different Heat Treatments (2024). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dcbc12fedb3529a2046f4a68fc299ecb14bc29b

3. Ismail, B., Nielsen, S.S. (2010). Invited review: Plasmin protease in milk: Current knowledge and relevance to dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 93(11). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3122

4. Destabilization of UHT milk by protease AprX from Pseudomonas fluorescens and plasmin (2018). https://openalex.org/W2802799032

5. D'Incecco, P., Rosi, V., Fortina, M.G., Sindaco, M., Ricci, G., Pellegrino, L. (2022). Biochemical, microbiological, and structural evaluations to early detect age gelation of milk caused by proteolytic activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens. European Food Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04033-8

6. Hui, D., Liang, W., Wang, R., Feng, X., Tang, X. (2025). A Review of Gelation of Plant Proteins and Their Influencing Factors. Sustainable Food Proteins 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/sfp2.70037

7. Schneider, A.A., Bu, F., Ismail, B.P. (2023). Enhancement of pea protein solubility and thermal stability for acidic beverage applications via endogenous Maillard-induced glycation and chromatography purification. Current Research in Food Science 6:100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100452

8. Nawaz, M.A., Singh, T.K., Stockmann, R., Jegasothy, H., Buckow, R. (2021). Quality Attributes of Ultra-High Temperature-Treated Model Beverages Prepared with Faba Bean Protein Concentrates. Foods 10:1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061244

9. Rheological Properties of Concentrated Skim Milk: Importance of Soluble Minerals in the Changes (2003). https://openalex.org/W2028512650

10. Influence of Heating Temperature and pH on Acid Gelation of Micellar Calcium Phosphate-Adjusted Milk (2024). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40406bf5226ff7e1314a966a31c8a43b8a01fe0f

11. Aguilera-Toro, M., Poulsen, N., Akkerman, M., Rauh, V., Larsen, L.B., Nielsen, S.D. (2022). Development in Maillard Reaction and Dehydroalanine Pathway Markers during Storage of UHT Milk Representing Differences in Casein Micelle Size and Sedimentation. Foods 11:1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11101525

12. Maillard glycation of beta-lactoglobulin with several sugars: comparative study of the properties of the obtained polymers and of the substituted sites (2001). Lait 81. https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2001155

13. Damodaran, S., Anand, K. (1997). Sulfhydryl-Disulfide Interchange-Induced Interparticle Protein Polymerization in Whey Protein-Stabilized Emulsions and Its Relation to Emulsion Stability. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45:3813-3820. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970319b

14. LaClair, C.E., Etzel, M.R. (2009). Turbidity and Protein Aggregation in Whey Protein Beverages. Journal of Food Science 74(7):C526-C535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01260.x

15. Zhang, W., Jin, M., Wang, H., Cheng, S., Cao, J., Kang, D. (2024). Effect of Thermal Treatment on Gelling and Emulsifying Properties of Soy β-Conglycinin and Glycinin. Foods 13:1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121804

16. Increasing the thermal stability of high-protein beverages through the modification of whey proteins through thermal processing (2026). Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27874

17. Pandalaneni, K., Bhanduriya, K., Amamcharla, J.K., Marella, C., Metzger, L.E. (2018). Influence of milk protein concentrates with modified calcium content on enteral dairy beverage formulations: Storage stability. Journal of Dairy Science 102:155-163. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15239

18. Yun, S.-Y., Imm, J. (2021). Changes in Particle Size, Sedimentation, and Protein Microstructure of Ultra-High-Temperature Skim Milk Considering Plasmin Concentration and Storage Temperature. Molecules 26:2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082339

19. Effects of storage time and temperature on the protein fraction of aseptic milk (2025). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/febd4ff3f693864c5c18c2a054b485e8b4cabcd8

20. Chihi, M., Mession, J., Sok, N., Saurel, R. (2016). Heat-Induced Soluble Protein Aggregates from Mixed Pea Globulins and β-Lactoglobulin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64:2780-2791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00087

21. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: a critical review (2010). https://openalex.org/W2018692029

22. Liu, J., Pedersen, H.L., Knarreborg, L., Ipsen, R., Bredie, W.L.P. (2020). Stabilization of directly acidified protein drinks by single and mixed hydrocolloids. Food Science & Nutrition 8:6433-6444. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1933

23. Rivera Flores, V.K., DeMarsh, T.A., Alcaine, S.D. (2020). Lactose oxidase: Enzymatic control of Pseudomonas to delay age gelation in UHT milk. Journal of Dairy Science 104(3):2759. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19452